War by other means: The Revolutionary Guards Corps fights sanctions on Iran’s energy sector

Jerusalem Post, 13/7.

Iran announced this week that it is set to transfer responsibility for part of its oil sales to three newly established private consortiums. This move is intended to counter the impact of an EU ban on importation, shipping and purchase of Iranian oil, which went into effect on July 1st.

The ban is the latest element in the sanctions program intended to force Iran to abandon its push for a nuclear weapons capability. It looks set to cost Teheran a decline in revenue from oil exports of billions of dollars per month. The EU move came together with tightened US penalties on countries that do business with Iran’s Central Bank.

The announcement by Iranian Oil Exporters’ head Hassan Khosrojerdi regarding the establishment of private consortiums to circumvent the sanctions, meanwhile, is the newest example of the creative campaign being waged by Iran to reduce the impact of international moves.

This campaign is being coordinated by the increasingly powerful Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), which today controls the commanding heights of the Iranian energy industry.

The energy sector is Iran’s richest source of revenue, accounting for around 80% of Iran’s exports. As of last April, Iran’s oil minister is Rostam Ghasemi, a senior member of the Revolutionary Guards. The Energy Minister, another Revolutionary Guardsman, is Majid Namju. The IRGC is the largest single contractor in the Iranian oil and gas sectors today.

Thanks to its growing political power, the economic and development wing of the IRGC, known as Khatam al-Anbia (Seal of the Prophets), has in recent years obtained a series of multi-billion dollar contracts in the energy sector in Iran. These include, for example, a $2.5 billion contract for the development of phases 15 and 16 of the massive South Pars gas field, which straddles Iran and Qatar. The Guards are also set to build a 900 km gas pipeline for transporting natural gas within Iran – a project worth $1.3 billion.

Through its control of the relevant ministries, the IRGC in effect awards these projects to itself. No process of competitive tender takes place.

In addition to its political and economic activities, and its conventional military capabilities, the IRGC is also the primary Iranian agency for the conducting of clandestine warfare. It is this part of its skills which is being demonstrated in its efforts to circumvent sanctions.

The Revolutionary Guards maintain a complex and constantly shifting network of front groups. These are being employed in sanctions-busting. Khatam al-Anbia, according to one report, has 812 affiliate companies. Iran has proved adept at the swift creation of new shell companies, in order to outrun the watchful eye of US sanctions enforcers. The advantage of the network maintained by the Revolutionary Guards is that companies working with it often have no formal, organizational connection to it, or to the Iranian state. Rather, genuine private companies established by trusted IRGC veterans work in close cooperation with the Guards, with few traceable or visible links.

Another element in Iran’s attempt to circumvent or reduce the impact of sanctions is the flourishing economic relationship with China. Again, this is largely administered by companies and semi-governmental bodies maintained by the IRGC. Chinese trade with Iran accounts for nearly 18 % of Iran’s total commerce.

China has slowed investments in order to avoid inclusion in US sanctions legislation. But the Chinese relationship with Iran’s economy remains huge, particularly in the areas of import of Iranian crude oil, and export of finished petroleum products to Iran.

Because of restrictions on Iran’s financial sector and the plummeting value of Iranian currency, barter is playing an increasingly important role in Iran’s transactions. China already ‘pays’ part of its oil debt to Iran through bartered goods. Iran has sought to trade oil for wheat with both Pakistan and Russia. India, the second largest purchaser of Iranian exports, pays up to 45% of its oil bill in rupees, into a special account set up for Iran at a state-owned Indian bank.

Such unorthodox transactions play havoc with the Iranian economy, and are an obvious impossibility for regular, private firms. For semi-public entities such as the Revolutionary Guards, however, arrangements of this kind work very well.

Conveniently for the IRGC, it also controls the smuggling industry into Iran. According to a recent report by the Iran Energy Project, smuggling enables Iran to secure much of the technology and equipment needed to service its energy sector. The report notes that Dubai is a central site for the trans-shipment of goods to Iran.

The growing importance of smuggling means that while the IRGC seeks to restrict the impact of sanctions, it also benefits from the desire of middle class Iranians hit by the restrictions to purchase goods on Iran’s black market. The IRGC, which takes a cut on all smuggling activities, profits from the demand by middle class Iranians for goods only available illegally.

Sanctions are hitting the Iranian economy hard. Yet there are no signs yet that they are causing the regime to think again regarding its nuclear program, or regarding its interference in political processes across the Middle East.

One explanation for this is that ideological regimes such as that of the Mullahs simply perform their cost-benefit analysis in a way different from that of more pragmatic governments. The nuclear program and the push for regional hegemony are cardinal strategic goals. Hence they will be pursued even in the face of impoverishment and critical damage to the economy.

However, an additional element should be added to this picture. While the sanctions are having a generally detrimental effect on Iran, they are paradoxically benefitting certain sectors closely associated with the regime.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps is waging a war-by-other-means in order to offset the impact of the sanctions. The damage to the Iranian economy and the fight against the sanctions are serving to increase both the wealth of the IRGC, and its growing centrality and importance in the power structure of the Iranian regime.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

The Sovereignty of Violence

‘And as our vineyards, fallows, meads and hedges, defective in their natures, grow to wildness, even so our houses and ourselves and children have lost, or do not learn for want of time, the sciences that should become our country, but grow like savages – as soldiers will – that nothing do but meditate on blood – to swearing, stern looks, diffused attire, and everything that seems unnatural.’ (William Shakespeare, Henry V).

I remember the sound of Muslim prayer, chanted in the morning by the FSA fighters. in their headquarters in the town of Binnish in Idleb Province, northern Syria. Before they set out for their day of making war. AK-47s and RPG-7s stacked up against the wall. There were rumors that the army would be coming into the town any day.

Bashar Assad’s troops and armor were deployed on the main highway, and out in the surrounding countryside. The army were laying siege to Homs at the time, and a trickle of refugees had made it northwards, telling stories of massacres. It was thought that Idleb would be next.

That was in February, 2012. I had entered Syria over the mountains, with a smugglers’ convoy running weaponry and supplies for the FSA in Idleb. I spent a week in the province, interviewing fighters and activists, attending demonstrations and gatherings of FSA fighters.

As it turned out, I missed the counter-attack, when it came. It was not until early March that Bashar’s army began to re-take the rebel-held zones of Idleb. The 76th Mechanized Brigade came through in the course of the month, leaving a trail of blood and executions in its wake. By that time, I had already made the return journey across the mountains, back to Antakya, and then Ankara, and then my home in Jerusalem.

Things have changed since that February, and not to the Assad regime’s benefit. The determined and systematic counter attack launched by the dictator’s army in February and March has not produced the hoped for quiet. The army can still re-take any area it chooses. But when it moves on, the rebellion comes back to life. 40,000 men are now under arms against Bashar Assad’s regime. His own force still nominally consists of 220,000 troops. In reality, he can make practical use of probably around a third of that number.

Money for the rebellion is coming in from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The FSA no longer has to rely on small smugglers’ convoys to bring the lifeblood of arms and ammunition. The Gulf Arabs’ money, along with reported US direction, are helping to turn the rebels into a fighting force able to mount an effective challenge to Assad.

The results in the field have been plain to see. Once the rebels had only rifles and RPG 7s, grossly inadequate against the armor and artillery and attack helicopters of the dictator. No longer. They are destroying tanks and armored vehicles in Idleb now. You can see the pictures of their rusting remains on Youtube. They are taking on the army head on in Homs governate, the heartland of the rebellion. Increasing parts of Syria are no longer under the control of the regime. From the Turkish border down to Hama, north and south of Homs city, in Zabadani.

In Idleb, the army controls the main highways, but the troops now rarely venture too far away from the main road. In the open areas and in the villages, armed men wait to strike at cumbersome, unsuspecting patrols.

It is a cruel, ugly and brutal conflict. Assad, aware that the walls are closing in, is employing his sectarian thugs in what looks like a systematic attempt to clear out non-Alawis from the Latakia Governate in the north-west. He appears to be creating a stronghold of Alawi population, which will form a safe zone and baseline for his side in the sectarian civil war now under way in Syria.

His forces routinely butcher civilians. Whole families in Taftanaz, in Idleb Province. Children in Houla. These are only the examples that the news media or researchers managed to reach. This is a regime steeped in blood.

The bloodshed leaves a wake of broken lives. There are traumatized children in Binnish, instantly recognizable. Kids who will not leave their parents’ side, even for a moment. These are children who have learned too early that the world is not a safe place. That the tender stories that parents tell their young ones, with love, about the kindness and order of the world outside, are only stories.

These are children who witnessed the rampage of the Shabiha through their homes, in search of their hidden activist fathers. Who watched as the pumped-up, steroid filled giants of Alawi killers smashed their homes to pieces. They have lost their innocence, at a time before the resignation that living brings could replace it with calm and acceptance. The result is in their eyes, which are prematurely knowing.

The stony cruelty is not only on the government side, of course. There are executions of captured Shabiha and army men. And there are the explosions in populated areas, the deaths of civilians. Assad likes to broadcast non-stop close ups of the results. On live TV, after an explosion in Aleppo, I saw a regime security officer holding up a severed human foot to the camera. Just in case of any misunderstandings, the man made a shaking motion with the foot. The severed tendons coming out of it danced like disconnected telephone wires.

One may assume that if the insurgency, in the end, wins this, retribution will come. There is no reason, though, to believe that the rebels in Syria represent any kind of new dawn in the blighted politics of the Arab world.

The Sunni jihadis are now coming across the border form Iraq, smelling blood.

The US decision to back the Saudis and Qataris in financing and arming the rebellion is helping this process along.

It should surprise no-one that sponsoring Qatar and Saudi Arabia to build the rebellion in Syria will result in a Sunni Islamist-dominated insurgency. The Qataris back the Muslim Brothers, so that is who is now growing stronger. The Saudis support the Salafis, so they are growing too. It is the Sunni Islamists who have the shiny new hardware that is destroying Assad’s tanks and his helicopters.

But even the officers and men of the Free Syrian Army, most of whom oppose Islamism, appear firmly within the familiar boundaries of Arab nationalism. The distrust of non-Arab minorities, the paranoia regarding the west and Israel. All are easy to discern. Hence the almost entirely Sunni Arab complexion of the rebellion against Assad preceded the current rise of the Sunni Islamists within it.

I have seen the regime side less close up, for obvious reasons. But when imagining the convoys across the mountains bringing money to the rebels, one should also picture the Russian ships bringing gleaming new arms and machines to the regime.

The ships of the Russian state arms firm Rosoboronexport are loaded up at the Ukrainian port of Oktabyrsk. They sail from the Black Sea, through the Bosphorous, to Cyprus and then to the Russian naval stronghold at Tartous in Latakia Governate.
They bring with them the wherewithal for Assad to make his war.

Both sides still believe they can win. Both sides still have men and arms and money and motivation. Civil war.

When I returned from Syria in late February, I was possessed for a while by a sort of bone-weariness that drains things of their color. I had experienced this quiet fatigue before, after returning from the war in Lebanon, in 2006.

It is nothing like the healthy, joyous exhaustion that one feels after participating in sports or physical exercise. It combines a generalized numbness with a heightened, too-sharp focus on specific aspects recently experienced. It passed after a week or two.

But it has left a residue, which I cannot shake off, because it is rooted not in perception, but in obvious reality. This is the conviction, based on observation and commonsense, that the politics of the Arab world are not changing.

The rebellion in Syria is being fought by rival sectarian groups. The Alawi-dominated regime is implacably hostile to the west. The Saudis and Qataris are obviously less so. Hence the strategic reasons why Russia and China are backing the regime, and why the US ought to be backing the rebels.

But as far as the fabric of life in the country goes, neither side represents anything that will change much for the people of Syria. In that country, and beyond it, the political culture of authoritarianism, paranoia, politicized religion and ultra-nationalism will continue to blight lives. This is the simple and obvious truth and it will remain so whether Islamists or nationalists of this or that stripe ultimately win out.

As a result, the young men, as young men do, are joining the colors of their various armed tribes.

Whether and when this will change is impossible to predict. But it isn’t changing now and there are few signs that it will change soon. Those who truly want open, free societies in the Arab world tend to find their way, one way or another, to the west.

Those of us who live on the borders of the strife do our best to protect ourselves against it. Those who live within it do their best to make their lives and protect their children.

In the meantime, the experience of conflict shapes and warps and twists. The children of Idleb that survived the onslaught of the 76th Mechanized Brigade and the Shabiha will grow in a stifled, unfree Syria, one way or another.

When we returned over the mountains we had to cross a narrow canal on foot, water up to our chests. We went through mud up to our knees, mud that sucks your shoes off. We wouldn’t have been able to run if we had stumbled into a patrol. But the border is long and quiet, and the dictator no longer has so many soldiers to spare to guard it. So we arrived back to Antakya. In the bar of the hotel, covered in mud and water at 3 am, I experienced a kind of momentary joy of astonishing intensity.

Then, waiting for me in the hotel room, that quiet, somber, disenchanted calm that comes after war zones. The Middle East is full of people with this feeling, one way and another. It is the silent accompaniment to all the noise and din of politics and war. Smother it with alcohol. Embrace your family. It returns, nevertheless. Returns, and then fades to a low background hum.

The Syrian civil war is currently consuming around 100 lives a day. It is not near to conclusion. Acts of great cruelty are being committed. Feats of astonishing and humbling bravery and courage are also taking place daily. The end result, it may be said with certainty given the nature of the forces currently engaged, will be authoritarian government of one kind or another. This is the reality of the Middle East, of the Arabic-speaking world, summer, 2012.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Sunni Islamism Stirs in Lebanon

As the civil war in Syria grinds on and assumes an increasingly sectarian character, echoes of the strife are being heard across the border in Lebanon.

The main beneficiary of the Arab uprisings of the last year has been Sunni Islamism. In Syria, Sunnis are playing an increasingly important role in the rebellion against President Bashar Assad. In Lebanon, too, individuals and movements of this type are emerging to prominence and issuing a challenge to the dominant political force in the country – Hezbollah. Sunni northern Lebanon, in particular the town of Tripoli, is a center both of Sunni Islamism and of support for the Syrian rebellion. The town has become a gathering point for foreign jihadi fighters on their way to fight the Assad regime.

The fate of Lebanon has always been acutely influenced by events in its larger neighbor, to the sorrow of many Lebanese. Currently, too, the Assad regime and Hezbollah are members of the same Iran-led regional bloc.

Lebanese Sunnis are aware of this alliance. Most have not happily acquiesced to the de facto Shi’a domination of Lebanon. They are aware also that Hezbollah is actively aiding Assad. Many are keen to play their own part in the unfolding battle, and to launch a Sunni resistance both to contest Hezbollah’s dominance of Lebanon and to support their fellow Sunnis against Assad’s local allies.

The problem for Lebanese Sunnis wishing to express and organize their discontent with Hezbollah has been a de facto vacuum of leadership in the community. The March 14 movement led by Saad Hariri sought to challenge Hezbollah in May,2008, and was quickly swept off the streets by the Shi’a militia. Saad Hariri has not been in Lebanon since last April.

Few Sunnis now see Hariri as a potential leader of the country. The March 14 strategy was to oppose Hezbollah’s guns with an appeal to international legality. Hezbollah contemptuously rolled over this approach.

As a result of this vacuum, and perhaps also in line with the mood of the times, the stirrings of Sunni discontent against the de facto domination of the country by Hezbollah are taking Islamist form. Sunni anger is currently coalescing around the figure of Sheikh Ahmad al-Assir, a Salafi cleric from the town of Sidon, in the south of the country. Assir, the Imam of the Bilal Ibn Rabah mosque in Sidon, has achieved prominence over the last year because of his outspoken statements in opposition to Hezbollah. In particular, the Salafi sheikh has focused on the independent military capacity maintained by the Shi’a movement.

On June 23, in an interview on Al- Jadeed TV in west Beirut, Assir appeared to offer a direct challenge to Hezbollah’s independent weapons capacity and to its domination of the country.

“Either we live as equal partners,” he said, “or else, I swear by God, O Hassan Nasrallah and Nabih Berri, I, Ahmad Assir, will shed every drop of my blood to prevent you from relaxing until balance is restored to Lebanon.”

Two days later, gunmen fired on the offices of Al-Jadeed TV.

Following this interview, Assir launched a permanent demonstration in Sidon (with echoes of the sitin launched by Hezbollah and its allies in Beirut in late 2006 against the then-government of Fuad Siniora.) He has vowed to maintain this protest until the issue of Hezbollah’s independent arms capacity is resolved.

Assir’s rise to prominence is built on a perception that he is stating openly what many Sunnis are saying privately.

Thus, in spite of the apparently quixotic aspect of a provincial Lebanese Sunni cleric making demands of a powerful Iran-backed militia, Hezbollah and its allies are taking the latest developments seriously.

The emergence of Assir as a spokesman for Sunni grievances is going hand-inhand with a broader rise in Sunni militancy elsewhere in Lebanon. There are reports of military training of Sunni Lebanese volunteers in the Bekaa Valley, before they cross the border into Syria to fight Assad’s forces. In the Sunni heartland of rural northern Lebanon, sentiment in favor of the Syrian rebels runs high, increased by close acquaintance with Sunni refugees who have fled Syria for Lebanon over the course of the last year.

It is, of course, impossible to predict whether the current Sunni ferment in Lebanon will take on the form of action against the de facto Shi’a domination of the country. Outside of the Salafi fringe, the Lebanese Sunnis lack a deep tradition of paramilitary activity.

Large numbers of more middle-class and Westernized Lebanese Sunnis distrust the Islamists. Hezbollah, meanwhile, is a daunting, well armed and brutal foe.

Still, it is worth remembering that in the Lebanese sectarian system, nothing is forever.

The various sects reach their uneasy modus vivendi based on the relative power balance between them at any given time. Until 2011, the Shi’a power of Hezbollah, armed, trained and financed by Iran, seemed to brook no possible rivals. The civil war in Syria brings with it the undermining of Iran’s local Arab state ally, which formed a vital partner for Hezbollah and its allies in their domination of Lebanon.

This for Sunnis makes feasible, or at least imaginable, a challenge to the current situation of Hezbollah/Shi’a domination. As a result of the Syrian civil war, the first stirrings of a Sunni attempt to once again “renegotiate” the sectarian balance of power in Lebanon are being felt.

This “re-negotiation,” if it happens, will be led by Sunnis. In Lebanon, however, they will face not a decrepit military-nationalist regime, but rather a powerful, mobilized, rival Shi’a Islamism. The Arab Spring, which should more accurately be called the Revolt of Sunni Islam, may be coming to Lebanon.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Tensions between FSA rebels, Kurdish Separatists in Syria

Jerusalem Post, 29/6.

At a recent meeting in London, I asked a Syrian Kurd whose affiliations are close to the nationalist PKK why the Kurds of Syria remained on the sidelines in the uprising against Bashar Assad. The Kurds of Syria, who number around 10% of the population of Syria, have largely preferred to avoid active involvement in the civil war now taking place.

His reply was enlightening. “What uprising?” he said, “What’s going on in Syria is a fight between the Assad regime on the one hand, and the Turkish government and the Muslim Brotherhood on the other. The Kurds have no part in this, and we need to protect our own areas against both the Assad regime, and the possibility of Turkish intervention.”

This statement, it is now clear, was not merely idle speculation. The PKK and its Syrian affiliates are currently organizing to prevent the Syrian revolution and its armed elements from activity in Kurdish areas in the country. This is leading to tensions with the Free Syrian Army.

The FSA now controls significant territorial enclaves within Syria. One of the largest of these stretches from the Turkish border in northern Aleppo province, west of Aleppo city and down to the area north of Idleb city. East of Aleppo, however, is an area of largely Kurdish population.

In the large area of Syria’s north-east stretching from the triangular border area where Syria meets Turkey and Iraq, to the town of Efrin, east of Aleppo city, the FSA has found its activities hindered by the presence of an armed Kurdish element.

These armed Kurds are not a merely local initiative. According to a report by Mohammad Ballout at the respected Al Monitor website, 4-4,500 PKK fighters travelled over the last year from the Qandil Mountains in northern Iraq, to northern Syria. Their presence, alongside mobilized local men, ensures the dominance in this majority Kurdish area of the Kurdish Democratic Union Party (PYD), which is the PKK’s representative movement among the Kurds of Syria.

This force has no interest in allowing Kurdish areas to be used for the operations of an insurgency which they regard as Turkish-sponsored, and Sunni Arab in nature.

The Assad regime has been happy to take advantage of the opportunity to ensure quiet in the north-east. According to Ballout’s report, the regime released 640 PYD members from its jails in 2011. Most of these militants made their way to the north to take part in the securing of the Kurdish region.

The town of Efrin, east of Aleppo, offers a gateway into Syria’s second largest city. The Free Syrian Army identifies securing control of Aleppo as a strategic goal. But the presence of the PYD-controlled fighters, who maintain checkpoints along the road from Efrin to Aleppo, has prevented the FSA from achieving this objective. The Kurdish fighters also try to prevent the smuggling of Saudi, Turkish and Qatari arms for the rebels across the Turkish border into the area they control.

The Kurdish-controlled area in Syria’s north-west has been acknowledged by the FSA leadership to represent a significant challenge. General Mustafa al-Sheikh, FSA chief of staff, told a Turkish newspaper that “the Syrian regime is trying to use the Kurds. The PKK has been mobilized in Syria on orders of the regime. The Syrian regime is supporting the PKK now against the interests of Turkey.”
Colonel Riyad Asaad of the FSA, who like al-Sheikh is based in southern Turkey, concurred that PKK fighters were present in the Efrin region. “The PKK guerrillas,” Asaad said, “are hindering the movement of our armed forces in these regions.”

The PYD is not overtly pro-Assad. The party is an affiliate of the National Coordination Committee, an opposition coalition which opposes external intervention into Syria. This group is regarded by the FSA and the Syrian National Council as a stooge of the regime.

PYD representatives freely acknowledge their opposition to FSA activity in the Kurdish north-east. Hussein Kocher, a local representative of the PYD, noted that “some time ago units of the FSA wanted to enter the Efrin region but the Kurdish people did not allow them. Kurds have their own forces and do not need Arab forces or forces from other countries.”

The PYD is of course not the only element active among the Kurds of Syria’s north east. But even its rivals in the 11 party Kurdish National Council (KNC), who are close to the Kurdish Regional Government of northern Iraq, are sceptical regarding the pro-Turkish and Arab nature of the uprising. Following recent tensions, the two groups signed an agreement sponsored by the Iraqi Kurdish leadership to prevent intra-Kurdish tensions.

This agreement seals the de facto Kurdish control of a large swathe of Syria’s north-east, and the placing of this area off limits to the insurgency against the Assad regime for the foreseeable future.

Sentiment among the Kurds there is not pro-regime. Demonstrations calling for the downfall of Assad do take place. But the distrust of the Turkish-backed rebel forces runs broad and deep. The broad consensus against allowing FSA activity is strengthened by a determination to spare the Kurdish population from the brutal regime retribution meted out elsewhere in the country.

Syrian Kurdish scepticism toward the rebellion is well-based. The main strategic backer of the rebels is indeed Erdogan’s Turkey. The Turkish government remains opposed to Kurdish demands for greater autonomy. Erdogan has ensured a top-heavy representation for the Muslim Brotherhood in the Turkish-sponsored Syrian National Council.

But even non-Islamist elements in the SNC and the FSA look for the most part suspiciously like Arab nationalists, from the Kurdish point of view. The appointment of a Kurd, Abd al Baset Sieda, as the nominal head of the SNC is likely to prove insufficient to dispel this sense.

So the Kurdish strategy appears to be to seek to sit out the Syrian civil war. If the rebels win, the Kurds will then try to negotiate from a position of strength with the new regime, from their fastness in the north-east of the country. In the unlikely event of Assad prevailing, the Kurdish stance will mean that they will avoid the worst fury of the regime’s revenge.

Minority communities have not so far done well out of the Arab uprisings. The main victor in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia has been Sunni Islamism.

The Kurds of Syria differ from many other regional minorities in that they possess separatist defense structures of their own. In the context of the earthquake currently taking place in Syria and beyond it, it is not surprising that they prefer to place their trust only in themselves.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Defections reflect doubts among Assad loyalists

Jerusalem Post, 26/06/2012

Analysis: Syrian rebels, having begun as an uprising against recognized authorities, are beginning to look more like a rival center of power in country.

The defection this week of a Syrian general, five other officers and 33 soldiers to Turkey represents the latest setback to the beleaguered regime of Bashar Assad in Damascus.

This brings the number of generals who have deserted Assad’s cause to 13 – in addition to thousands of rank-and-file soldiers and more junior officers.

Three Syrian pilots also defected to Jordan on Sunday.

These latest losses to the Syrian dictator are of course not decisive in themselves. But they add to the general picture in which the regime, while still defiant, is visibly running out of ideas.

It is doubling down on the only strategy available to it – increasing the pitch and the brutality of its attempt to crush the rebellion by force. This strategy is succeeding in creating an ever-larger body count. But it is showing no signs of stopping the rebellion. This in turn is leading toward growing disillusionment among the remaining loyal forces.

Reliable estimates now suggest that the Syrian rebels have around 40,000 fighters available to them. This is a significant force, though one still concentrated in particular areas of the country.

By comparison, the Muslim Brotherhood uprising that Assad’s father crushed in Hama in 1982 never had more than around 4,000 insurgents under its banner.

Assad officially controls an army of just over 200,000 men.

But only some of them are sufficiently trusted to be engaged against the rebellion.

The Syrian rebels, having begun as an uprising against the recognized authorities, are beginning to look more like a rival center of power in the country. The latest defections are evidence that this is becoming apparent to a growing number of Assad’s men.

Many aspects are coming together to create this impression.

First, the rebels are in de facto control of a growing swathe of Syrian territory. This is despite the determined and bloody counter-offensive that the regime launched in March, in an attempt to reconquer areas under rebel control.

The Assad regime still has the capability to conquer and control any specific point in Syria.

But it does not possess sufficient loyal forces to simultaneously occupy and control all areas of support for the insurgency.

Assad controls the cities and main highways throughout Syria. But in a large part of the north, his troops no longer venture far into the countryside.

The area between Aleppo and Idlib cities is now effectively under rebel control. A second “safe zone” stretching from the Turkish border down to the outskirts of Hama is in the hands of the rebellion. Smaller rebel-controlled zones in Deraa governate, north and south of Homs city and in the Zabadani area near Lebanon have also been carved out.

Second, the rebels are able to call on more sophisticated weaponry, which is making its way across the border from Turkey, financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and coordinated with Turkish and possibly also US help.

These increased capabilities are making a difference. Improvised explosive devices are being used to harass Assad’s forces, and photographic evidence has emerged of destroyed tanks in the north of the country. The death toll among loyalist forces is growing.

Increasingly, Assad prefers to use artillery and attack helicopters rather than armor and infantry.

This is an indication of declining manpower and perhaps also reduced trust on the part of the regime in its own foot soldiers.

Third, the Assad regime’s downing of a Turkish F-4 fighter jet last week threatens to bring down retribution. The Turks have called for a meeting of NATO countries under article 4 of the NATO charter, set to take place this week.

The Assad regime will be waiting to see if the downing of the aircraft proves to be the factor that finally precipitates more determined and overt international action against it. Turkey has proven unwilling to act alone, however, so this will depend on the views of other member states that have displayed marked reluctance toward stronger measures.

In any case, fear of this possibility also forms a background to the growing jitters among larger numbers of Assad’s men and growing numbers of Assad’s troops. Thirty-nine such men, including a general, made their way with their families from northern Syria to Hatay province in Turkey this week as a result of these doubts. More are likely to follow.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Syrian Rebels Gaining Ground

As the UN Observer Mission in Syria ceases its activities, there are indications that the Syrian rebels are beginning to gain the upper hand against the Assad regime. The rebels have scored notable achievements against government forces in recent days. There are corresponding signs of growing demoralization among regime troops, and among those sections of the population still supporting Assad.

The advantage in the civil war in Syria has ebbed and flowed. The rebels began to establish ‘liberated zones’ in parts of the country from around last October. In late February, the regime launched a determined, bloody counter-attack to re-conquer these areas, and largely achieved this in time for the ‘ceasefire’ of April 10. With the ceasefire now in tatters, the indications are that the momentum of the insurgency has picked up again, and is now driving forward against the regime’s forces.

Once again, it is the central Syrian city of Homs which is the main focal point. Government forces were massing outside of the city over the weekend, apparently in preparation for a fresh assault. But as the troops assembled to re-take the urban center of Homs, it has become apparent that large swathes of the surrounding countryside are no longer under government control.

A reporter for Mcclatchy News, embedded with Free Syrian Army fighters in Homs governate, noted that the rebels have now expelled government troops from the towns of Rastan and Talbiseh, north of Homs city. The rebels are also battling for Qusayr, to the south of Homs. The FSA unit engaged in this area is the Farouq Brigade, one of the best organized of the free army formations.

An individual identified as a former captain of Assad’s army captured by the FSA expressed his surprise at the rebels’ strength. “We didn’t imagine they had these numbers and so much equipment,’ he told McClatchy.

Rebels also noted an increased use by regime forces of attack helicopters, in order to avoid the necessity of engaging rebels on the ground.

The Arabic Sharq al-Awsat newspaper is indicating a similar direction to events. The paper this week described a growing mood of ‘restlessness and fear’ among mid-level officers of Assad’s army.

It noted a conviction spreading among many of Assad’s officers that the rebels must prevail in the end, through sheer force of numbers. Officers quoted similarly expressed acknowledgement that the rebel forces were larger and more organized than they had expected. They dismissed the notion that the insurgents consisted merely of ‘gangs’, as regime propaganda maintains.

One officer said that “there is a new reality that we are feeling daily on the ground. But the regime refuses to recognize this.”

The spread of the violence into areas which regime supporters had considered firmly under Assad’s control is increasing the mood of despondency.

For a period, the Syrian capital Damascus managed to maintain an appearance of near-normality. No longer. In an under-reported but significant development, the rebels launched a series of coordinated attacks in and around the city last Friday.

The neighborhood of Kfar Soussa, a stronghold of anti-regime sentiment in Damascus, was the scene of heavy fighting. Large explosions were also heard in the Mazzah, Qudsiyeh and al-Qadam neighborhoods.

The town of Douma, in the Damascus suburbs, also witnessed clashes. Sources suggest that the eruption of the rebellion into urban Damascus for the first time has removed the last vestiges of normality to which pro-regime elements were clinging.

The fighting in the heart of Damascus, especially in Kafr Soussa, is seen by Damascenes as a major loss for the government. Many members of the city’s upper middle class have left for abroad. Damascus’s Old City is almost under curfew, with checkpoints at all points of entry and exit.

All these indications are at root the product of a significant increase in recent months in the abilities of the rebel forces. This improvement is almost certainly the result of greater quantities of Saudi and Qatari aid reaching the rebels, mostly across the border from Turkey. There have been some suggestions of US intelligence and special forces engaging in helping to direct this aid, though this has yet to be confirmed.

The battle is not over, nor is it yet decided. But it is the rebels who now have the initiative, and who are gaining ground.

The regime, meanwhile, appears to be following a dual strategy. While maintaining a fortress-like hold on the capital, and still seeking to re-conquer urban centers held by the rebels, the regime is also carving out an Alawi enclave in the north-west of the country. Non-Alawis are being expelled from the designated area. This area will form a safe zone and ‘baseline’ for the regime, Assad hopes, in the event of a long, protracted war.

It is not clear if this strategy will succeed. But the very fact that it is being adopted shows that the regime is seeking to reduce and consolidate its commitments, in the face of the widening rebel assault upon it. The Syrian civil war is entering a new phase.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

A loon claims that I am an ‘adviser’ to the ‘Free Syrian Terrorist Army’

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Interview on ABC News

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-31/20120531-worldiv-raw/4045298

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

The Rise of Hamas-Gaza

Hamas, the Palestinian Islamist movement which controls the Gaza Strip, recently held internal elections. The polls were for the Gaza Political Bureau and Shura Council, often described as the movement’s parliament. Hamas holds its votes in secret, and tries to prevent the outside world from gaining knowledge of the movement’s internal political processes. However, it has become clear that the elections represented a significant victory for Hamas’s Gaza leadership. This came at the expense of the formerly Damascus-based external leadership group of Khaled Meshaal, which is now scattered across the region.

Gaza Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh is now the head of the Gaza Political Bureau. This is the top movement position in the Strip. He is the first to hold this title since Abd al-Aziz Rantisi was killed by Israel in 2004.

The latest victory of the Gaza leaders may be a step on the road to their capture of the overall leadership of Hamas. This advance, in turn, may be traced back to two key elements.

First, the Gaza leaders possess power, a key element that their rivals lack. They hold real political and administrative power and control over the lives of the 1.7 million inhabitants of Gaza and of the 365 square kilometers in which they live. Second: the upheavals in the Arab world — and specifically the civil war in Syria — have served to severely weaken the formerly Damascus-based external leadership, depleting the value of the assets they held in the competition with the internal Gaza leaders.

The nature of the regime created by Hamas in Gaza, and its strength and durability, has received insufficient attention in the West. This may have a political root: Western governments feel the need to keep alive the fiction of the long-dead peace process between Israelis and Palestinians. One of the necessary components of this is pretending that the historic split between nationalists and Islamists among the Palestinians has not really happened, or that it is a temporary glitch that will soon be reconciled. This fiction is necessary for peace process believers, because it enables them to continue to treat the West Bank Palestinian Authority of Mahmoud Abbas as the sole representative of the Palestinians.

But fiction it is. An Islamist one-party quasi-state has been built in Gaza over the last half-decade. The prospects for this enclave and its importance in the period ahead have been immeasurably strengthened by the advances made by Hamas’ fellow Muslim Brotherhood branches in Egypt and elsewhere in the region.

Hamas has created a unique, Sunni Islamist form of authoritarian government in the Gaza Strip. It has successfully crushed all political opposition. It has created a security system in which a movement militia, the Qassam Brigades, exists alongside supposedly non-political security forces which are themselves answerable to Hamas-controlled ministries. It has imposed the will of the Hamas government on the formerly PA-controlled judiciary, and has simultaneously created a parallel system of Islamic courts.

The result of all this is that there is today no serious challenge to Hamas control of Gaza.

Against this center of real-world power, the external Hamas leadership faced the prospect of growing irrelevance in recent years. It was saved from this irrelevance because it controlled the foreign contacts — most importantly with Iran — that brought the donations vital to the survival of the Gaza enclave. This money in turn underwrote the existence of the Qassam Brigades, and hence made any challenge from Gaza to the external leadership unfeasible.
Then the “Arab Spring” came to Syria, home base of the external leadership. Hamas, a Muslim Brotherhood franchise, faced a dilemma. The Iran-led regional alliance of which it was a part was crushing an uprising at least partially led by its fellow Muslim Brothers in Syria.

Hamas made its choice — in favor of the Muslim Brotherhood. As a result, Iranian donations have rapidly depleted. The external leadership has scattered in a number of directions from Damascus: Meshaal is in Qatar; Mousa Abu Marzook is in Cairo; Imad Alami has returned to Gaza. There are members as far afield as Istanbul and Khartoum.

The internal leadership, meanwhile, has increased revenues from the smuggling tunnels between Sinai and Gaza since the fall of Mubarak in Egypt. This is helping to make up for the decline in Iranian support.

Reports suggest that control of the movement’s budget and of the Qassam Brigades has now been removed from Meshaal, though he retains his formal position as the movement’s overall leader. The internal leadership also headed off an attempt by Meshaal to cobble together a “reconciliation” deal with the West Bank PA in February. Such a deal would have required Hamas to dismantle the structures of its government in Gaza.

Palestinian nationalism has traditionally favored words and gestures over concrete deeds. This is one of the sources for its historical failure to produce anything much tangible of note. Palestinian Islamism has a different approach: in line with the traditional strategy of the Muslim Brotherhood, it understands the importance of concrete, patient building on the ground.

This does not mean that Hamas in Gaza has lost sight or will lose sight of the maximalist ideological goals of the movement. It does mean, however, that the split in the Palestinian national movement should now finally be internalized as a long-term development. The more formidable, serious element of that movement is in control of Gaza. The Islamist one-party statelet in Gaza, in turn, is allied with the trend that is proving the major beneficiary of the Arab upheavals of 2011 — namely, Sunni Islamism.

If the Muslim Brotherhood comes to power in Egypt, Hamas-controlled Gaza may yet become a point of strategic importance as a friction point with Israel, which could lead to broader tensions.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Syrian Kurdish dissident: ‘Break Syria into Pieces’

Jerusalem Post 16/05/2012

Sherkoh Abbas, a veteran Syrian Kurdish dissident, called on Israel this week to support the break-up of Syria into a series of federal structures based on the country’s various ethnicities.

Speaking from Washington, Abbas was also critical of US attempts to induce Syrian Kurds to join and work with the main opposition body, the Syrian National Council. Abbas, who heads the Washington- based Kurdistan National Assembly, said that dismantling Syria into ethnic enclaves with a federal administration would serve to “break the link” between Syria and the Iran-led “Shi’a crescent.”

Syrian Kurdish, Druse, Alawite and Sunni Arab federal areas, he suggested, would have no interest in aligning with Iran.

At the same time, a federalized Syria would avoid the possibility of a resurgent, Muslim Brotherhood-controlled Sunni Islamist Syria emerging as a new challenge to Israel and the West.

“We need to break Syria into pieces,” Abbas said.

The Syrian Kurdish dissident argued that a federal Syria, separated into four or five regions on an ethnic basis, would also serve as a natural “buffer” for Israel against both Sunni and Shi’ite Islamist forces.

Kurds are the largest ethnic minority population in Syria. They number more than 10 percent of the population, centered in the northeastern provinces of Hasakeh and Qamishli.

There is also a large, partly Arabized Kurdish population in the cities of Aleppo, Hama and Damascus.

Despite the Assad regime’s determined counter-attack in recent months, Abbas dismissed any possibility that the beleaguered dictator could survive in the long term.

“Whether it is one year, or even two, the regime is finished,” he said.

The KNA leader pointed to the recent bloody terror attacks in Damascus as an indication of President Bashar Assad’s desperation, arguing that these were the work of Sunni jihadis in the pay of of Assad.

“The regime is now unleashing its suicide groups,” he asserted.

His remarks came in response to a meeting at the US State Department last week between American officials and representatives of the Kurdish National Council, a Syrian Kurdish body. Robert Ford, who left his post as US ambassador to Syria earlier this year, and Fred Hof, the administration’s special coordinator on Syria, took part in the meeting. State Department Deputy Spokesman Mark Toner described its purpose as part of “ongoing efforts… to help the Syrian opposition build a more cohesive opposition to Assad.”

Abbas, however, was more blunt in his description of the meeting’s purpose. It was held, he said, so that the US officials could tell the Kurdish representatives, “You should be part of the Syrian National Council.”

So far, only one Syrian Kurdish organization – the Future Movement of Fares Tammo – has elected to join the SNC.

Many Kurds distrust the SNC because of the strong presence of Muslim Brotherhood members in its leadership, and because of its close links to the government of Turkey.

SNC leader Burhan Ghalioun has rejected the existence of any region called “Kurdistan” within Syria. He has called on Syrian Kurds to abandon what he called the “useless illusion” of federalism.

Early Kurdish recruits to the council withdrew from it after failing to secure a commitment to change the name of a post-Assad Syria from the current Syrian Arab Republic to the plain “Syrian Republic.” The SNC has also made no commitment to Kurdish autonomy in a post-Assad Syria.

Radwan Ziadeh, a prominent Washington- based member of the SNC, said that the issue of the Syrian Kurds could only be settled after the fall of the Syrian regime, in the context of democracy.

Perhaps because of these positions, the Syrian Kurdish attitude toward the uprising has remained cautious. The Kurds have many deep grievances against the Assad regime: It deprived many of them of citizenship, it transferred Arab settlers into northern Syria to break Kurdish contiguity of population, and it suppressed Kurdish language and culture.

But the Syrian opposition as currently constituted seems to many Kurds to be insufficiently interested in remedying this situation. The Kurds are also divided among themselves. The KNC is dominated by the Kurdish Democratic Party in Syria, which has close links to the Kurdish Regional Government of Massoud Barzani in northern Iraq. The PKK-linked PYD, meanwhile, is, according to Abbas and others, now working in cooperation with the Assad regime.

PYD-linked sources argue that the current Syrian uprising is simply a battle between the regime and an alliance of the Turkish government and the Muslim Brotherhood. As such, they suggest, Syrian Kurds’ main interest is in protecting their own areas.

The bottom line, as Qubad Talabani, representative of the Kurdistan Regional Government to the US, put it in a recent speech, is that the “Syrian opposition is not talking about Kurdish issues, is not talking about the need to protect Kurdish rights or to have the Kurdish identity as part of any new Syria.” For as long as this remains the case, calls for federalism, for separation, and for breaking Syria “into pieces” are likely to grow stronger.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment