Jerusalem Post, 30/7
Iran is currently experiencing a significant wave of unrest. Protests began on July 15, in Khuzestan Province, located in the south west of the country. The initial focus was a scarcity of water in recent months, which has led to deaths among livestock, and consequent impoverishment among farmers in the ethnically diverse province. The lack of water is also leading to a breakdown in electricity provision, and frequent blackouts.
But while scarcity of water was the initial trigger, the protests soon began to include more generalized slogans against the ruling Islamist regime. Khuzestan Province, in which Arab Iranians form the largest community, is a place of high unemployment, poorly served by the central government in terms of services. In the course of the week, the protests spread, with additional, though smaller, demonstrations taking place in Isfahan, Karaj, Kermanshah and Tabriz cities.
On Monday, the unrest reached the Iranian capital, Teheran. Videos and reports from the Teheran protests show demonstrators chanting against the regime. Slogans including ‘Death to the Dictator,’ ‘Khamenei, shame on you – leave Iran alone,’ and, notably ‘No Gaza, no Lebanon, my life for Iran.’ The latter chant, heard also in the widespread unrest which hit Iran in late 2019, reflects the widespread perception among Iranians that their country’s resources are being wasted on support for Islamic causes across the region, leading to international sanctions and leaving little available for Iran’s own population.
Notably, protestors also chanted slogans in favor of Reza Shah, the military officer who founded the Pahlavi dynasty in the early part of the 20th century, and who is remembered as a modernizing force by many Iranians.
The authorities have reacted to the protests with predictable harshness. In a repeat of what took place in late 2019, internet reception has been blocked in Khuzestan Province. Activists in Iran are deeply concerned at what they describe as regime efforts to build a ‘national internet’ system along Chinese lines, (and, some maintain, with Chinese assistance). Such a system would severely curtail the ability of Iranian citizens to communicate with one another and to access online sources not approved by the regime.
Riot Police and Revolutionary Guards personnel have been rushed to restive areas. Ten people so far are reported to have been killed. As of the beginning of this week, according to Amnesty International, the authorities commenced the use of live fire against protestors. In the nationwide protests of late 2019, over 1500 people were killed. The death toll in the current protests looks set now to sharply rise.
The blocking of internet provision to areas affected by unrest has two purposes: firstly, it prevents or complicates communication between protestors, who rely on online channels to spread the word concerning protests, in particular in keeping other parts of the country informed of events and seeking to broaden unrest (other means are available for communication and propaganda on a more local level). Secondly, internet restrictions prevent protestors from keeping international audiences from seeing their videos and messages.
So what has precipitated the current wave of unrest? And is there reason to believe that this round of protests may differ from previous periods of discontent, and may succeed in posing the question of the continued existence of the clerical regime in Iran?
Regarding the first issue, as with previous waves of protest in Iran and elsewhere, a cluster of causes may be identified. Since last year, Khuzestan has been affected by a severe drought. According to Iran’s meteorological service, the months from October 2020 to June 2021 were the driest for the last 53 years. The Karun River, which flows through Khuzestan Province, has now entirely dried up.
But the water shortages in Khuzestan and elsewhere in Iran are not solely the product of unavoidable climactic conditions. These have been exacerbated by policies deemed necessary because of the broader regime strategy of confrontation with the west and its regional allies.
Like past regimes which sought to challenge the core rules of the international system, the Iranian regime seeks to secure for itself as far as is possible independent sources of food provision. This has led to an emphasis on the development of agriculture within Iran. This in turn has led to an over exploitation of water resources which is now producing negative results. Around 90% of Iran’s total water consumption is used by the agricultural sector. The main crops grown in Khuzestan are rice and sugar cane, both of which require large amounts of water.
Overexploitation of water resources for a period of decades, took place in the absence of a coherent national strategy for the husbanding of water. The result is now becoming apparent in the growing salinity and in places aridity of considerable parts of Iran’s south. This is bringing water shortages to the population, and raises the possibility of large scale movements of population. Over damming of water resources, which leads to the drying up of reservoirs, is exacerbating the issue.
Drought, exacerbated by clumsy and unsuccessful state policy, has played a role in the fomenting of unrest and instability elsewhere in the Middle East. In Syria, for example, a severe drought combined with the effect of economic mismanagement led to the departure of 1.5 million farmers from their lands in the pre-2011 period. The result was the emergence of a class of displaced, poor, Sunni Arab families in and around Damascus and other major cities. The insurgency that began in Syria in late 2011 found its most willing footsoldiers from among this sector.
So might the current drought inspired unrest in Iran produce a similar result?
While nothing should be ruled out, the current situation is still very far from there. The protests under way are considerably smaller than those witnessed in 2019. There is still, crucially, a lack of any kind of credible revolutionary leadership, able to pose a popular alternative to the rule of the clerics and the IRGC.
But for all that, according to one Iranian source, the current protests do have real significance. This source notes that the water and electricity shortages are without precedent, and are serving to turn popular sentiment away from further thoughts of reform, and towards a wholesale rejection of the current regime. If such a wholesale and thorough rejection of the system itself is indeed spreading among the public, it may well bring further results over time. Certainly the current events in Iran are yet more proof that the Achilles heel of the Iranian system is its inability to create workable conditions of social and economic life for the populations that live under its control. This inability, in time, may well prove fatal to the regime. For the moment, the unrest, and the crackdown, are continuing.